The Public Guardian v AM
The respondent attorney acted in contravention of his authority and not in the donor's best interests by withdrawing funds for his own benefit without proper justification or accounting, and the donor lacks capacity to revoke the LPA herself. The LPA must be revoked and a deputy appointed.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Public Guardian; Respondent: AM; Incapacitated Person: Carla (CMW)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- LPA for property and affairs revoked; registration cancelled; deputy to be appointed.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Lasting Power of Attorney, Attorney's Fiduciary Duties, Appointment of Deputy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Public Guardian
Applicant
AM
Respondent
Carla (CMW)
Incapacitated Person
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the attorney acted contrary to the donor's best interests and authority under the LPA
- 2 Whether the LPA for property and affairs should be revoked
- 3 Whether the donor lacks capacity to revoke the LPA
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent attorney acted in contravention of his authority and not in the donor's best interests by withdrawing funds for his own benefit without proper justification or accounting, and the donor lacks capacity to revoke the LPA herself. The LPA must be revoked and a deputy appointed.
Court Disposition
LPA for property and affairs revoked; registration cancelled; deputy to be appointed.
Orders
- LPA for property and affairs revoked under section 22(4)(b) MCA 2005
- Public Guardian to cancel registration of the LPA
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment