HC, Re
Payments to CC and JC for care were reasonable, affordable, and less expensive than alternatives. Expenditure on property was justified and in HC's best interests. CC's explanations were satisfactory and he may continue as deputy with conditions.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Public Guardian; Respondent: CC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Deputyship Revocation Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Deputyship not revoked; retrospective approval granted for past payments and expenditures; deputy continues with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Deputyship, Revocation of Deputyship, Best Interests, Property and Affairs, Care Payments, Retrospective Approval
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Public Guardian
Applicant
CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Deputyship Revocation Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CC should be removed as deputy for HC's property and affairs
- 2 Whether payments to CC and JC for care were reasonable and in HC's best interests
- 3 Whether expenditure on property renovation was justified and properly accounted for
Ratio Decidendi
Payments to CC and JC for care were reasonable, affordable, and less expensive than alternatives. Expenditure on property was justified and in HC's best interests. CC's explanations were satisfactory and he may continue as deputy with conditions.
Court Disposition
Deputyship not revoked; retrospective approval granted for past payments and expenditures; deputy continues with conditions.
Orders
- Payments to CC and JC for care from 14 September 2009 to date retrospectively approved and authorised.
- Deputy authorised to pay himself up to £1,500/month and JC up to £100/month for care, index-linked to ASHE 6145.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment