P, Re [2015] EWCOP 37 (03 June 2015)
H is unsuitable to be P's attorney because he breached his fiduciary duty by using P's money for his own debts, failed to manage her assets in her best interests, and remains under the influence of MQ. Revocation of the EPA and appointment of deputies is necessary and proportionate to protect P's interests and prevent further risk.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCOP 37
- Parties
- Applicant: THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN; Respondent: H
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- EPA revoked; deputies appointed
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney, Attorney's Fiduciary Duties, Best Interests of Donor, Appointment of Deputies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN
Applicant
H
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether H is unsuitable to act as attorney for P under the Enduring Power of Attorney
- 2 Whether the EPA should be revoked and deputies appointed
Ratio Decidendi
H is unsuitable to be P's attorney because he breached his fiduciary duty by using P's money for his own debts, failed to manage her assets in her best interests, and remains under the influence of MQ. Revocation of the EPA and appointment of deputies is necessary and proportionate to protect P's interests and prevent further risk.
Court Disposition
EPA revoked; deputies appointed
Orders
- The Enduring Power of Attorney made by P and registered on 12 March 2013 is revoked.
- The Public Guardian is directed to cancel the registration of the EPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment