DT, Re
DT is satisfied with his sons’ management of his affairs, there is no evidence of dishonesty or sufficient detriment to justify revocation, and the employment of a panel deputy would be a disproportionate drain on his resources. The attorneys’ actions, while not perfect, do not render them unsuitable under the statutory test.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Public Guardian; Respondent: IT; Respondent: PT; Respondent: MT
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Revoke and Cancel Registration of Enduring Power of Attorney (epa) / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney, Suitability of Attorneys, Best Interests, Financial Provision for Spouse, Costs of Deputyship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Public Guardian
Applicant
IT
Respondent
PT
Respondent
MT
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application to Revoke and Cancel Registration of Enduring Power of Attorney (epa) / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the attorneys are unsuitable to act under the EPA for DT
- 2 Whether the EPA should be revoked and registration cancelled
- 3 Whether the attorneys have failed in their duties under the Mental Capacity Act 2005
Ratio Decidendi
DT is satisfied with his sons’ management of his affairs, there is no evidence of dishonesty or sufficient detriment to justify revocation, and the employment of a panel deputy would be a disproportionate drain on his resources. The attorneys’ actions, while not perfect, do not render them unsuitable under the statutory test.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Public Guardian’s application to revoke the EPA is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment