DT, Re

DT, Re

DT is satisfied with his sons’ management of his affairs, there is no evidence of dishonesty or sufficient detriment to justify revocation, and the employment of a panel deputy would be a disproportionate drain on his resources. The attorneys’ actions, while not perfect, do not render them unsuitable under the statutory test.

Parties
Applicant: The Public Guardian; Respondent: IT; Respondent: PT; Respondent: MT
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Application to Revoke and Cancel Registration of Enduring Power of Attorney (epa) / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney, Suitability of Attorneys, Best Interests, Financial Provision for Spouse, Costs of Deputyship

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 14
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Public Guardian

Applicant

IT

Respondent

PT

Respondent

MT

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to Revoke and Cancel Registration of Enduring Power of Attorney (epa) / Judgment After Contested Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the attorneys are unsuitable to act under the EPA for DT
  2. 2 Whether the EPA should be revoked and registration cancelled
  3. 3 Whether the attorneys have failed in their duties under the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Ratio Decidendi

DT is satisfied with his sons’ management of his affairs, there is no evidence of dishonesty or sufficient detriment to justify revocation, and the employment of a panel deputy would be a disproportionate drain on his resources. The attorneys’ actions, while not perfect, do not render them unsuitable under the statutory test.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Public Guardian’s application to revoke the EPA is dismissed.