AB (Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney)
MD and WD are unsuitable to be AB's attorneys due to mismanagement of funds, unauthorized gifts and loans, breach of fiduciary duties, and prioritizing family interests over AB's, justifying revocation of the Enduring Power of Attorney.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Public Guardian; Respondent: MD; Respondent: WD; Respondent: The London Borough of Brent
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- EPA revoked; Brent Council appointed as deputy
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney, Attorney Suitability, Fiduciary Duties, Appointment of Deputy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Public Guardian
Applicant
MD
Respondent
WD
Respondent
The London Borough of Brent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Revocation of Enduring Power of Attorney / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the attorneys MD and WD are unsuitable to act as AB's attorneys under the Enduring Power of Attorney
- 2 Whether the Enduring Power of Attorney should be revoked
- 3 Who should be appointed as deputy for AB's property and affairs
Ratio Decidendi
MD and WD are unsuitable to be AB's attorneys due to mismanagement of funds, unauthorized gifts and loans, breach of fiduciary duties, and prioritizing family interests over AB's, justifying revocation of the Enduring Power of Attorney.
Court Disposition
EPA revoked; Brent Council appointed as deputy
Orders
- The Enduring Power of Attorney is revoked.
- The Public Guardian is directed to cancel the registration of the EPA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment