Abbott & Ors v R.
The surcharge for multiple offences must be calculated based on the aggregate sentence or fine, not the highest individual component. No second surcharge is imposed for activation of suspended sentences or breach of community orders. Sentences must reflect the basis of plea and the totality principle.
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: Scott Abbott; 2nd Appellant: Graham Michael Hawker; 3rd Appellant: Craig Karl Harrison; Respondent: The Queen; Intervener: The Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; sentences and surcharge orders varied.
- Legal Topics
- Surcharge Orders, Sentencing Principles, Breach of Suspended Sentence, Public Order Offences, Sexual Offences, Drug Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott Abbott
1st Appellant
Graham Michael Hawker
2nd Appellant
Craig Karl Harrison
3rd Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
The Secretary of State for Justice
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Calculation of surcharge orders for multiple offences
- 2 Approach to surcharge in mixed disposals (fine and imprisonment)
- 3 Imposition of surcharge upon activation of suspended sentences or breach of community orders
Ratio Decidendi
The surcharge for multiple offences must be calculated based on the aggregate sentence or fine, not the highest individual component. No second surcharge is imposed for activation of suspended sentences or breach of community orders. Sentences must reflect the basis of plea and the totality principle.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; sentences and surcharge orders varied.
Orders
- Craig Karl Harrison: sentence quashed and substituted with 21 months' imprisonment; surcharge reduced to £140.
- Graham Michael Hawker: suspended sentence activation reduced to 18 months; overall imprisonment reduced to 2.5 years; surcharge unaltered at £140.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment