RL & Anor, R. v
A prosecution for the strict liability offence under section 85 Water Resources Act 1991 may be brought against an unincorporated association in its own name, as 'person' includes such associations per the Interpretation Act 1978, and no contrary intention appears in the statute. Individual members may also be prosecuted absent personal culpability, as their liability is primary, not vicarious, but the Crown may elect to prosecute the association alone.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Queen; Respondent: RL; Respondent: JF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court Ruling on Motion to Quash Indictment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; no retrial ordered; respondents acquitted.
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Unincorporated Associations, Statutory Interpretation, Strict Liability Offences, Criminal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Appellant
RL
Respondent
JF
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Crown Court Ruling on Motion to Quash Indictment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unincorporated association can be prosecuted for a statutory strict liability offence under section 85 Water Resources Act 1991
- 2 Whether individual members of an unincorporated association can be prosecuted for such an offence absent personal culpability
- 3 Whether the absence of specific statutory procedural provisions signals a contrary intention to the Interpretation Act 1978 definition of 'person'
Ratio Decidendi
A prosecution for the strict liability offence under section 85 Water Resources Act 1991 may be brought against an unincorporated association in its own name, as 'person' includes such associations per the Interpretation Act 1978, and no contrary intention appears in the statute. Individual members may also be prosecuted absent personal culpability, as their liability is primary, not vicarious, but the Crown may elect to prosecute the association alone.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; no retrial ordered; respondents acquitted.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed in part.
- No order for a fresh trial under section 61(4)(b) Criminal Justice Act 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment