Hawkesbrook Leisure v The Reece-Jones Partnership
Hawkesbrook was carrying on a commercial enterprise with a view to making a surplus, and the inability to distribute profit to members does not preclude it from being a business under s.23 of the 1954 Act; thus, it is entitled to the protection afforded to business tenants.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hawkesbrook Leisure Limited; Defendant: The Reece-Jones Partnership
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- preliminary issue answered in the affirmative
- Legal Topics
- Business Tenancies, Statutory Interpretation, Non Profit Organisations, Security of Tenure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hawkesbrook Leisure Limited
Claimant
The Reece-Jones Partnership
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant occupied the premises for the purposes of a business within the meaning of Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 so as to be entitled to statutory protection
Ratio Decidendi
Hawkesbrook was carrying on a commercial enterprise with a view to making a surplus, and the inability to distribute profit to members does not preclude it from being a business under s.23 of the 1954 Act; thus, it is entitled to the protection afforded to business tenants.
Court Disposition
preliminary issue answered in the affirmative
Orders
- The claimant is found to have occupied the premises for the purposes of a business within the meaning of Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment