The Reverend Paul Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors
Proceedings commenced in breach of a civil proceedings order under section 42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981, without obtaining the required leave of the High Court, are a nullity and cannot be retrospectively validated. The statutory intention is to impose a jurisdictional bar, not a procedural one, to protect courts and respondents from vexatious litigation.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Reverend Paul Williamson; Respondents: The Bishop of London and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigants, Jurisdictional Bars, Leave to Institute Proceedings, Employment Discrimination, Limitation Periods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Reverend Paul Williamson
Appellant
The Bishop of London and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings commenced in breach of a civil proceedings order under section 42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 are a nullity or may be stayed pending leave
- 2 Whether the statutory requirement for leave is jurisdictional or procedural
Ratio Decidendi
Proceedings commenced in breach of a civil proceedings order under section 42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981, without obtaining the required leave of the High Court, are a nullity and cannot be retrospectively validated. The statutory intention is to impose a jurisdictional bar, not a procedural one, to protect courts and respondents from vexatious litigation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment