Ashworth & Ors v The Royal National Theatre

Ashworth & Ors v The Royal National Theatre

The claimants have strong prospects at trial for breach of contract, but specific performance or interim injunction is not appropriate due to breakdown of trust and confidence, interference with artistic expression under Article 10 ECHR, and adequacy of damages as a remedy. The balance of convenience lies against granting interim relief.

Parties
Claimant: Ashworth and Others; Defendant: The Royal National Theatre
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application for Injunction or Specific Performance
Outcome
Interim relief refused
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Interim Injunctions, Termination of Employment Contracts, Freedom of Artistic Expression

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ashworth and Others

Claimant

The Royal National Theatre

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Application for Injunction or Specific Performance

  1. 1 Whether the National Theatre was contractually entitled to terminate the claimants' contracts on the grounds set out in its 4 March 2014 letters
  2. 2 Whether specific performance or an injunction is available to require re-engagement of the claimants
  3. 3 Whether damages are an adequate remedy for the claimants

Ratio Decidendi

The claimants have strong prospects at trial for breach of contract, but specific performance or interim injunction is not appropriate due to breakdown of trust and confidence, interference with artistic expression under Article 10 ECHR, and adequacy of damages as a remedy. The balance of convenience lies against granting interim relief.

Court Disposition

Interim relief refused