W, R (on the application of) v The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal & Anor
The tribunal failed to adequately address relevant evidence regarding J's behaviour and the need for an escort, and its reasons for rejecting the claimant's evidence on costs were insufficient. The decision was set aside for lack of proper consideration of material evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant: W; Defendant: The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal; Defendant: The London Borough of Hillingdon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; tribunal decision quashed and remitted to a fresh tribunal
- Legal Topics
- Special Educational Needs, Public Expenditure, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W
Claimant
The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
Defendant
The London Borough of Hillingdon
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal properly considered evidence regarding the need for an escort for J and associated costs
- 2 Whether the tribunal's reasons for rejecting the claimant's evidence on costs were adequate
- 3 Whether the tribunal disregarded relevant evidence of J's behaviour
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal failed to adequately address relevant evidence regarding J's behaviour and the need for an escort, and its reasons for rejecting the claimant's evidence on costs were insufficient. The decision was set aside for lack of proper consideration of material evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; tribunal decision quashed and remitted to a fresh tribunal
Orders
- Decision of the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal quashed
- Matter remitted to a fresh tribunal for reconsideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment