Zaha Hadid Limited v The Zaha Hadid Foundation
Clause 12 of the Licence Agreement, properly construed, does not confer a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice; only the Licensor has such rights. The Licence Agreement does not operate as an unlawful restraint of trade as it is a rational commercial bargain for the use of valuable trade marks,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Zaha Hadid Limited; Defendant: The Zaha Hadid Foundation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contract Terms, Trade Mark Licensing, Restraint of Trade, Termination of Contracts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zaha Hadid Limited
Claimant
The Zaha Hadid Foundation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 12.1 of the Licence Agreement confers a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice
- 2 Whether the Licence Agreement or any part of it operates as an unlawful restraint of trade
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 12 of the Licence Agreement, properly construed, does not confer a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice; only the Licensor has such rights. The Licence Agreement does not operate as an unlawful restraint of trade as it is a rational commercial bargain for the use of valuable trade marks, and the obligations imposed are not unreasonable or contrary to public policy.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment