Zaha Hadid Limited v The Zaha Hadid Foundation

Zaha Hadid Limited v The Zaha Hadid Foundation

Clause 12 of the Licence Agreement, properly construed, does not confer a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice; only the Licensor has such rights. The Licence Agreement does not operate as an unlawful restraint of trade as it is a rational commercial bargain for the use of valuable trade marks,...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Zaha Hadid Limited; Defendant: The Zaha Hadid Foundation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Contract Terms, Trade Mark Licensing, Restraint of Trade, Termination of Contracts
Contract Law Intellectual Property Interpretation of Contract Terms Trade Mark Licensing Restraint of Trade Termination of Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zaha Hadid Limited

Claimant

The Zaha Hadid Foundation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether Clause 12.1 of the Licence Agreement confers a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice
  2. 2 Whether the Licence Agreement or any part of it operates as an unlawful restraint of trade

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 12 of the Licence Agreement, properly construed, does not confer a right on the Licensee to terminate on reasonable notice; only the Licensor has such rights. The Licence Agreement does not operate as an unlawful restraint of trade as it is a rational commercial bargain for the use of valuable trade marks, and the obligations imposed are not unreasonable or contrary to public policy.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed