Theodossiades v Smith & Ors

Theodossiades v Smith & Ors

Demolition of an existing dwelling house and replacement with a new block of flats is not a 'conversion' within the meaning of Section 610 of the Housing Act 1985; therefore, the restrictive covenant cannot be varied under this provision.

Parties
Applicant: Theodossiades; Respondent: Smith & Ors
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Restrictive Covenants, Statutory Interpretation, Planning Permission, Conversion of Premises

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Theodossiades

Applicant

Smith & Ors

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the proposed development constitutes a 'conversion' within the meaning of Section 610 of the Housing Act 1985
  2. 2 Whether demolition and replacement of a dwelling house is covered by Section 610

Ratio Decidendi

Demolition of an existing dwelling house and replacement with a new block of flats is not a 'conversion' within the meaning of Section 610 of the Housing Act 1985; therefore, the restrictive covenant cannot be varied under this provision.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • application for permission to appeal is dismissed