Alan Phillips Associates Ltd v Terence Edward Dowling (t/a The Joseph Dowling Partnership & Ors
Given the close identity between Mr Phillips and his company, his control and benefit from the litigation, and his deliberate failure to notify insurers, it is just to make a third party costs order against him personally.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Alan Phillips Associates Ltd; Defendants/respondents: Terence Edward Dowling t/a The Joseph Dowling Partnership & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Order on Third Party Costs
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Costs Order, Piercing the Corporate Veil, Professional Indemnity Insurance, Director Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Phillips Associates Ltd
Claimant/appellant
Terence Edward Dowling t/a The Joseph Dowling Partnership & Ors
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Order on Third Party Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a third party costs order should be made against Mr Alan Phillips personally under section 51 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
- 2 Whether the corporate veil should be pierced due to the close identity between Mr Phillips and his company
- 3 Whether Mr Phillips' failure to notify insurers justifies a costs order against him
Ratio Decidendi
Given the close identity between Mr Phillips and his company, his control and benefit from the litigation, and his deliberate failure to notify insurers, it is just to make a third party costs order against him personally.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Third party costs order against Mr Alan Phillips personally upheld
- Appellant to pay costs as ordered by the lower court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment