Bowman, R v

Bowman, R v

The court held that the criticisms of the prosecution's expert evidence were not made out, that the fresh evidence from pathologists did not render the verdict unsafe, and that the jury's verdict was supported by the pathology evidence and other strands of the prosecution case. The appeal was dismissed as the conviction was deemed safe.

Parties
Prosecution: R; Appellant: Thomas Bowman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fresh Evidence, Expert Evidence, Murder, Manslaughter, Sexual Offences, Child Witness Reliability
Criminal Law Fresh Evidence Expert Evidence Murder Manslaughter Sexual Offences Child Witness Reliability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Thomas Bowman

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for murder is unsafe in light of fresh expert evidence
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution's expert evidence was overstated or unbalanced
  3. 3 Whether the reliability of child witness testimony affects the safety of the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the criticisms of the prosecution's expert evidence were not made out, that the fresh evidence from pathologists did not render the verdict unsafe, and that the jury's verdict was supported by the pathology evidence and other strands of the prosecution case. The appeal was dismissed as the conviction was deemed safe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The conviction for murder stands.
  • No leave granted to amend grounds of appeal.