Frontiers Capital I Ltd Partnership v Flohr [2023] EWHC 2723 (Ch) (06 November 2023)

Frontiers Capital I Ltd Partnership v Flohr [2023] EWHC 2723 (Ch) (06 November 2023)

The claimant has a realistic prospect of establishing that the general partner retains authority to pursue the claim on behalf of the dissolved partnership, either under the partnership agreement or by operation of section 38 of the Partnership Act 1890, as the proceedings may be reasonably required to wind up the partnership's affairs. The evidence does not justify summary judgment or strike out at this stage.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 2723 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Frontiers Capital I Limited Partnership (acting by Frontiers Capital General Partner Limited); Defendant: Thomas Flohr
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application—summary Judgment/strike Out and Standing to Sue
Outcome
Application for summary judgment/strike out refused; claim not struck out on standing grounds
Legal Topics
Standing of General Partner After Dissolution, Authority to Sue Post Dissolution, Section 38 Partnership Act 1890, Limited Partnerships Act 1907, Interpretation of Partnership Agreements, Summary Judgment Standards
Partnership Law Company Law Civil Procedure Standing of General Partner After Dissolution Authority to Sue Post Dissolution Section 38 Partnership Act 1890 Limited Partnerships Act 1907 Interpretation of Partnership Agreements +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frontiers Capital I Limited Partnership (acting by Frontiers Capital General Partner Limited)

Claimant

Thomas Flohr

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) / Interlocutory Application—summary Judgment/strike Out and Standing to Sue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the general partner of a limited partnership has standing to sue a third party after dissolution and winding up, in respect of a pre-dissolution cause of action
  2. 2 Whether section 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 permits such proceedings as 'necessary' to wind up the partnership's affairs
  3. 3 Whether the partnership was dissolved in accordance with the Limited Partnership Agreement (LPA) and if the general partner's authority persists

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant has a realistic prospect of establishing that the general partner retains authority to pursue the claim on behalf of the dissolved partnership, either under the partnership agreement or by operation of section 38 of the Partnership Act 1890, as the proceedings may be reasonably required to wind up the partnership's affairs. The evidence does not justify summary judgment or strike out at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment/strike out refused; claim not struck out on standing grounds

Orders

  • Claimant's claim not struck out for lack of standing
  • Summary judgment refused on standing issue