Daly & Anor v Ryan & Anor

The court found a compelling reason to impose the condition due to Ryan's history of evading debts, lack of full disclosure, and the risk of non-enforcement. Ryan failed to provide sufficient evidence that the condition would stifle the appeal. The condition is proportionate and does not breach Article 6 ECHR.

Parties: Claimant: Seamas Daly; Claimant: Photo Images Limited; Defendant: Thomas Gerrard Ryan; Defendant: Ryan Corporation (UK) Limited
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 21 April 2021
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Application for Condition to Appeal
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Costs Orders, Security for Costs, Debarring Orders, Appeal Conditions, Enforcement of Judgments

Civil Procedure Costs Orders Security for Costs Debarring Orders Appeal Conditions Enforcement of Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Seamas Daly

Claimant

Photo Images Limited

Claimant

Thomas Gerrard Ryan

Defendant

Ryan Corporation (UK) Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Condition to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether a condition requiring payment of costs orders should be imposed as a precondition to pursuing an appeal
2 Whether the imposition of such a condition would stifle the appeal in breach of Article 6 ECHR
3 Whether the defendants have provided sufficient disclosure of their financial position

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Defendants must pay the sums due under the First and Second Costs Orders within 14 days as a condition of pursuing the appeal.