Judge v Crown Leisure Ltd
The words spoken by the employer did not amount to a sufficiently certain contractual promise but were statements of intention too vague to be enforceable; thus, there was no fundamental breach of contract and no constructive dismissal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Thomas Judge; Respondent: Crown Leisure Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Contractual Promise, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Judge
Appellant
Crown Leisure Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a legally binding contractual promise to bring the appellant's salary to parity with a colleague within a specified period
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law or procedure in its findings and application of the law
Ratio Decidendi
The words spoken by the employer did not amount to a sufficiently certain contractual promise but were statements of intention too vague to be enforceable; thus, there was no fundamental breach of contract and no constructive dismissal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment