Judge v Crown Leisure Ltd

Judge v Crown Leisure Ltd

The words spoken by the employer did not amount to a sufficiently certain contractual promise but were statements of intention too vague to be enforceable; thus, there was no fundamental breach of contract and no constructive dismissal.

Parties
Appellant: Thomas Judge; Respondent: Crown Leisure Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Contractual Promise, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomas Judge

Appellant

Crown Leisure Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether there was a legally binding contractual promise to bring the appellant's salary to parity with a colleague within a specified period
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law or procedure in its findings and application of the law

Ratio Decidendi

The words spoken by the employer did not amount to a sufficiently certain contractual promise but were statements of intention too vague to be enforceable; thus, there was no fundamental breach of contract and no constructive dismissal.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.