Shanks, R. v
The trial judge's directions regarding the previous conviction were accurate and did not misrepresent its effect or unfairly prejudice the appellant's credibility. The jury was correctly told the conviction was binding as to possession with intent to endanger life on the day in question, but not as to intent to kill. The appeal grounds failed as the judge's directions were proper and the evidence of intent was overwhelming.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Defendant: Thomas Shanks
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Diminished Responsibility, Provocation, Admissibility of Previous Convictions, Intent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Thomas Shanks
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury regarding the effect of the previous conviction for possessing a firearm with intent to endanger life
- 2 Whether the jury was wrongly told they were bound by the previous conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's directions regarding the previous conviction were accurate and did not misrepresent its effect or unfairly prejudice the appellant's credibility. The jury was correctly told the conviction was binding as to possession with intent to endanger life on the day in question, but not as to intent to kill. The appeal grounds failed as the judge's directions were proper and the evidence of intent was overwhelming.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction of murder dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment