R v Thomas Stuart Lewis

R v Thomas Stuart Lewis

The applicant entered a guilty plea voluntarily, as evidenced by his signed basis of plea and willingness to plead guilty to a lesser offence. There are no arguable grounds to suggest the conviction was unsafe or that time for appeal should be extended.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Thomas Stuart Lewis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Guilty Plea, Extension of Time, Stalking, Protection From Harassment Act
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Guilty Plea Extension of Time Stalking Protection From Harassment Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Thomas Stuart Lewis

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's conviction was unsafe given his guilty plea
  2. 2 Whether there were grounds to extend time for appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant entered a guilty plea voluntarily, as evidenced by his signed basis of plea and willingness to plead guilty to a lesser offence. There are no arguable grounds to suggest the conviction was unsafe or that time for appeal should be extended.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application to extend time refused
  • Renewed application to appeal conviction refused