Peter Jenkins v Thurrock Council
The Claimant maintained an unrealistic and disproportionate costs budget despite opportunities to modify it, resulting in unnecessary expenditure of court and party resources. The court found the Claimant's conduct justified an order for him to pay the Defendant's costs of the Costs Management Hearing, and capped recoverable costs for budget preparation by 35%.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Peter Jenkins; Defendant: Thurrock Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Costs Management Hearing
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay Defendant's costs of and occasioned by the Costs Management Hearing on 17 July 2024.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Management, Budgeting, Proportionality, Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Peter Jenkins
Claimant
Thurrock Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Costs Management Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant's costs budget was proportionate and realistic
- 2 Appropriate costs order following significant reductions to Claimant's budget
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimant maintained an unrealistic and disproportionate costs budget despite opportunities to modify it, resulting in unnecessary expenditure of court and party resources. The court found the Claimant's conduct justified an order for him to pay the Defendant's costs of the Costs Management Hearing, and capped recoverable costs for budget preparation by 35%.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay Defendant's costs of and occasioned by the Costs Management Hearing on 17 July 2024.
Orders
- Claimant to pay Defendant's costs of the Costs Management Hearing.
- Claimant's recoverable costs for budget preparation capped by 35%.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment