Goodwood Investments Holdings Inc v Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG (M/Y PALLADIUM)

Goodwood Investments Holdings Inc v Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG (M/Y PALLADIUM)

No binding settlement agreement was concluded because both the Builder’s Offer and Purchaser’s Response were expressly subject to board approval and execution of a formal settlement agreement; neither party was bound until approval and execution occurred; no interim obligation arose.

Parties
Claimant: Goodwood Investments Holdings Inc.; Defendant: Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Application Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.45 / Judgment on Application for Determination of Question of Law Arising in Arbitration
Outcome
Application dismissed; no binding settlement agreement found.
Legal Topics
Settlement Agreements, Board Approval, Without Prejudice Correspondence, Subject to Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Goodwood Investments Holdings Inc.

Claimant

Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions AG

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application Under Arbitration Act 1996 S.45 / Judgment on Application for Determination of Question of Law Arising in Arbitration

  1. 1 Whether correspondence between parties' solicitors created a binding and enforceable settlement agreement
  2. 2 Whether adjournment of arbitration constituted acceptance or binding settlement
  3. 3 Whether Builder was under a legally binding obligation to seek board approval and not prevent approval

Ratio Decidendi

No binding settlement agreement was concluded because both the Builder’s Offer and Purchaser’s Response were expressly subject to board approval and execution of a formal settlement agreement; neither party was bound until approval and execution occurred; no interim obligation arose.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; no binding settlement agreement found.

Orders

  • No settlement agreement exists between the parties; arbitration may proceed.