Wight & Anor v Olswang [2000] EWCA Civ 310 (7 December 2000)
The judge erred in treating the pleaded breaches as mere decisions not to sell, rather than failures to consider or implement sales due to conflicts and statutory concerns. The summary judgment was inappropriate as the claims raised triable issues of breach and causation requiring full trial.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 310
- Parties
- Appellant: Tiffany Wight; Appellant: Felix Wight; Respondent: Simon Olswang; Former Co Respondent: Roger Peters
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment Under CPR Part 24
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duty, Summary Judgment, Trustee Duties, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tiffany Wight
Appellant
Felix Wight
Appellant
Simon Olswang
Respondent
Roger Peters
Former Co Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment Under CPR Part 24
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee breached fiduciary duties by failing to consider or implement sale of trust assets
- 2 Whether summary judgment was appropriate given the pleaded breaches and causation issues
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in treating the pleaded breaches as mere decisions not to sell, rather than failures to consider or implement sales due to conflicts and statutory concerns. The summary judgment was inappropriate as the claims raised triable issues of breach and causation requiring full trial.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Matter to proceed to trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment