Sarnoff v YZ
The Employment Tribunal has power under rule 29 to make disclosure orders against parties regardless of their location; rule 31 is limited to non-parties, and the geographical limitation does not apply to parties.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tim Sarnoff; Respondent: YZ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure Orders, Jurisdiction, Case Management Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Parties
Tim Sarnoff
Appellant
YZ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal has power to make disclosure orders against parties not in Great Britain
- 2 Interpretation of Employment Tribunal Rules regarding disclosure
- 3 Scope of case management powers under rule 29
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal has power under rule 29 to make disclosure orders against parties regardless of their location; rule 31 is limited to non-parties, and the geographical limitation does not apply to parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment