Police of the Metropolis & Anoir v Times Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 776 (QB) (18 April 2011)
The issues raised by Times Newspapers Ltd's application to vary the injunction order cannot be resolved on an interim basis and must proceed to trial. The application to vary the order is dismissed. Applications in the libel action are adjourned to be heard by another judge. The court did not determine the substantive legal points regarding the use of confidential material or the stay of the libel action at this stage.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 776
- Parties
- Claimant: THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS; Claimant: THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY; Defendant: TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Application in Injunction Proceedings Related to Libel Action / Interim Application; Applications for Directions and Variation of Injunction Order
- Outcome
- Application to vary injunction dismissed; applications in libel action adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Justification (truth) Defence, Reynolds Defence, Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Trial), Article 10 ECHR (freedom of Expression), Article 8 ECHR (right to Privacy), Non Party Disclosure, Interim Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS
Claimant
THE SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY
Claimant
TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interim Application in Injunction Proceedings Related to Libel Action / Interim Application; Applications for Directions and Variation of Injunction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Times Newspapers Ltd can use confidential police material in its defence of truth in a libel action
- 2 Whether the interim injunction restraining use of confidential material should be varied
- 3 Whether the libel action should be stayed pending resolution of injunction proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The issues raised by Times Newspapers Ltd's application to vary the injunction order cannot be resolved on an interim basis and must proceed to trial. The application to vary the order is dismissed. Applications in the libel action are adjourned to be heard by another judge. The court did not determine the substantive legal points regarding the use of confidential material or the stay of the libel action at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application to vary injunction dismissed; applications in libel action adjourned
Orders
- TNL's application to vary the order of 27 January 2011 is dismissed
- Applications in the libel action are adjourned to be heard by another judge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment