Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd & Ors
There is jurisdiction for the court to order different modes of trial for different issues, but in this case, having fulfilled the exclusionary criteria under s.69(1), the action as a whole, including the preliminary issue of meaning, should be tried by judge alone. There is no significant countervailing advantage to justify jury trial for the issue of meaning.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lance Armstrong; Defendant: Times Newspapers Ltd; Defendant: David Walsh; Defendant: Alan English
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Ruling on Mode of Trial for Preliminary Issue of Meaning
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue of meaning to be determined by judge alone.
- Legal Topics
- Mode of Trial, Jury Trial, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lance Armstrong
Claimant
Times Newspapers Ltd
Defendant
David Walsh
Defendant
Alan English
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Ruling on Mode of Trial for Preliminary Issue of Meaning
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the preliminary issue of meaning in a libel action should be tried by judge alone or with a jury
- 2 Jurisdiction of the court to order different modes of trial for different issues under s.69 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
Ratio Decidendi
There is jurisdiction for the court to order different modes of trial for different issues, but in this case, having fulfilled the exclusionary criteria under s.69(1), the action as a whole, including the preliminary issue of meaning, should be tried by judge alone. There is no significant countervailing advantage to justify jury trial for the issue of meaning.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue of meaning to be determined by judge alone.
Orders
- The preliminary issue of meaning shall be determined by judge alone.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment