Colorcon Ltd v Huckell & Ors [2009] EWHC 979 (Ch) (07 May 2009)
The court found convincing proof that both the employer and trustees shared the common intention that deferred pensions would be revalued at 5% or the rate of increase in the Retail Price Index (if lower), and that the 1996 Rules did not reflect this intention due to a drafting error. Rectification was necessary to give effect to the true intention.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 979 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Colorcon Ltd; Defendant: Timothey Huckell; Defendant: Stephen Batchelor; Defendant: Susan Sampson; Defendant: Kevin McGlue; Defendant: Howard Stracey; Defendant: Simon Tasker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (chancery) / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted; rectification ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust Deeds, Occupational Pension Schemes, Summary Judgment, Representative Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colorcon Ltd
Claimant
Timothey Huckell
Defendant
Stephen Batchelor
Defendant
Susan Sampson
Defendant
Kevin McGlue
Defendant
Howard Stracey
Defendant
Simon Tasker
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (chancery) / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Rules of the Colorcon Ltd Staff Benefits Plan should be rectified to reflect the common intention regarding deferred pension revaluation.
- 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted for rectification.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found convincing proof that both the employer and trustees shared the common intention that deferred pensions would be revalued at 5% or the rate of increase in the Retail Price Index (if lower), and that the 1996 Rules did not reflect this intention due to a drafting error. Rectification was necessary to give effect to the true intention.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted; rectification ordered.
Orders
- The Rules of the Colorcon Ltd Staff Benefits Plan are to be rectified to provide for deferred pension revaluation at 5% or the rate of increase in the Retail Price Index (if lower).
- Simon Tasker appointed to represent all relevant members and beneficiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment