Josette Ann Prevost & Anor. v Timothy Edward McCarthy

Josette Ann Prevost & Anor. v Timothy Edward McCarthy

The amendments to the particulars of claim and reply, including the plea of presumed undue influence, are permitted as they have a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial. The defendant's application for summary judgment and strike out is refused as the issues raised are fact-sensitive and require full examination at trial.

Parties
Claimant: Josette Ann Prevost; Claimant: Flynn Philip Prevost; Defendant: Timothy Edward McCarthy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Ruling on Summary Judgment and Amendments
Outcome
Defendant's application for summary judgment and strike out refused; claimants' application to amend pleadings allowed.
Legal Topics
Share Purchase Agreements, Undue Influence, Misrepresentation, Mistake, Consideration, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Amendment of Pleadings
Contract Law Equity Company Law Share Purchase Agreements Undue Influence Misrepresentation Mistake Consideration +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josette Ann Prevost

Claimant

Flynn Philip Prevost

Claimant

Timothy Edward McCarthy

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application Ruling on Summary Judgment and Amendments

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2016 Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) is valid and enforceable
  2. 2 Whether the 2016 SPA was procured by undue influence
  3. 3 Whether the 2016 SPA should be set aside for misrepresentation or mistake

Ratio Decidendi

The amendments to the particulars of claim and reply, including the plea of presumed undue influence, are permitted as they have a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial. The defendant's application for summary judgment and strike out is refused as the issues raised are fact-sensitive and require full examination at trial.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application for summary judgment and strike out refused; claimants' application to amend pleadings allowed.

Orders

  • Claimants permitted to amend particulars of claim and reply as proposed.
  • Issues of validity of the 2016 SPA, undue influence, misrepresentation, mistake, and consideration to proceed to trial.