Evesham And Pershore Housing Association Ltd v Werrett
The judge's decision of 19th May was a final order and could only be varied in exceptional circumstances, which were not present; the evidence did not establish that the defendant lacked capacity to litigate under the Mental Capacity Act 2005; the application for permission to appeal was refused.
- Parties
- Claimant: Evesham and Pershore Housing Association Ltd; Defendant: Timothy Werrett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal; Appeal If Permission Granted
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Capacity, Appointment of Litigation Friend, Variation of Final Orders, Mental Capacity Act 2005, Civil Procedure Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Evesham and Pershore Housing Association Ltd
Claimant
Timothy Werrett
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Permission to Appeal; Appeal If Permission Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant lacked capacity to litigate under the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- 2 Whether the court had power to vary or revoke a previous final order under CPR r.3.1(7)
- 3 Whether the judge erred in allowing adversarial opposition to the application
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's decision of 19th May was a final order and could only be varied in exceptional circumstances, which were not present; the evidence did not establish that the defendant lacked capacity to litigate under the Mental Capacity Act 2005; the application for permission to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- application for permission to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment