Wiltshire v Powell & Ors
A purchaser of goods is not bound by a judgment against his vendor unless the purchase occurred after the judgment. Since the respondents acquired the aircraft before the judgment in favour of Mr Wiltshire, they are not privies in estate and are not estopped from asserting their title. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Timothy Wiltshire; 1st Respondent: Michael Powell; 2nd Respondent: Paul Etherington; 3rd Respondent: Derek Heapy; 4th Respondent: Peter Storey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Estoppel, Privity, Title to Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Timothy Wiltshire
Appellant
Michael Powell
1st Respondent
Paul Etherington
2nd Respondent
Derek Heapy
3rd Respondent
Peter Storey
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment in personam binds third parties who derive title from a party to the original proceedings
- 2 Whether estoppel per rem judicatam applies to purchasers of goods who acquired title before judgment
Ratio Decidendi
A purchaser of goods is not bound by a judgment against his vendor unless the purchase occurred after the judgment. Since the respondents acquired the aircraft before the judgment in favour of Mr Wiltshire, they are not privies in estate and are not estopped from asserting their title. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs to be assessed if not agreed
- Leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment