Tingdene Developments Ltd v Ann Margaret Armstrong (Eastern : Pitch Fee) [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UN_PHI_2014_0003 (24 June 2014)
The Tribunal determined the appropriate pitch fee for the property at 66 Castlehill Park, Essex, in accordance with statutory requirements.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT RP_CAM_22UN_PHI_2014_0003
- Parties
- Applicant: Tingdene Developments Ltd; Respondent: Ann Margaret Armstrong
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) Park Homes Decision / Determination of Pitch Fee
- Outcome
- Pitch fee determined
- Legal Topics
- Pitch Fee, Park Homes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Tingdene Developments Ltd
Applicant
Ann Margaret Armstrong
Respondent
Procedural Posture
First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) Park Homes Decision / Determination of Pitch Fee
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pitch fee for 66 Castlehill Park should be determined or varied
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined the appropriate pitch fee for the property at 66 Castlehill Park, Essex, in accordance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Pitch fee determined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment