K-L (Children), Re
The judge's change of mind regarding findings of sexual abuse was not properly reasoned, and the procedural irregularities and lack of judicial explanation undermine confidence in the findings. All judgments and orders must be set aside and the case remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: TL; Respondent: LE; Respondent: Liverpool City Council; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; all judgments and orders set aside; case remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Fact Finding Hearings, Judicial Reasoning, Appeals, Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TL
Appellant
LE
Respondent
Liverpool City Council
Respondent
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's change of mind regarding findings of sexual abuse was properly reasoned
- 2 Whether the findings in judgment 3 can stand as the effective outcome
- 3 Whether the procedural irregularities undermine the integrity of the fact-finding process
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's change of mind regarding findings of sexual abuse was not properly reasoned, and the procedural irregularities and lack of judicial explanation undermine confidence in the findings. All judgments and orders must be set aside and the case remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; all judgments and orders set aside; case remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- All three judgments and the April order are set aside.
- The case is remitted to the Liverpool Family Court for rehearing on all issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment