Ruth v R
The appellant was not properly convicted of the knuckleduster offence as there was no indictment, arraignment, or conviction; therefore, the sentence for that offence and the related breach of conditional discharge must be quashed. The sentences on counts 1 and 2 were appropriate given the aggravating features and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Tobias Daniel Ruth; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy to Cause Criminal Damage, Conspiracy to Send Malicious Communications, Possession of Offensive Weapon, Sentencing Procedure, Conditional Discharge, Racial Aggravation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tobias Daniel Ruth
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence for possession of an offensive weapon (knuckleduster) was lawful
- 2 Whether the sentence for breach of conditional discharge was lawful
- 3 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was not properly convicted of the knuckleduster offence as there was no indictment, arraignment, or conviction; therefore, the sentence for that offence and the related breach of conditional discharge must be quashed. The sentences on counts 1 and 2 were appropriate given the aggravating features and are upheld.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence for possession of offensive weapon (knuckleduster) quashed
- Sentence for breach of conditional discharge quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment