Hecquet v McCarthy & Ors [2006] EWHC 832 (Ch) (12 April 2006)
Standing under Section 459 is satisfied by formal requirements: registered members and transferees of shares have standing to petition, regardless of beneficial interest or refusal to register. Prejudice to interests is relevant to relief, not to standing.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 832 (Ch)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Terence Hecquet; Petitioner: Robert Hoare; Petitioner: Robert Marsden; Respondent: Tom McCarthy; Respondent: Malcolm McCarthy; Respondent: Edwin McCarthy; Respondent: McCarthy Surfacing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Section 459 Companies Act 1985 Petition / Preliminary Issue on Standing
- Outcome
- Petitioners have standing to maintain the petition.
- Legal Topics
- Standing Under Section 459, Shareholder Rights, Transfer of Shares, Unfair Prejudice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Terence Hecquet
Petitioner
Robert Hoare
Petitioner
Robert Marsden
Petitioner
Tom McCarthy
Respondent
Malcolm McCarthy
Respondent
Edwin McCarthy
Respondent
McCarthy Surfacing Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 459 Companies Act 1985 Petition / Preliminary Issue on Standing
Legal Issues
- 1 Do the petitioners have standing to maintain a petition under Section 459 of the Companies Act 1985?
Ratio Decidendi
Standing under Section 459 is satisfied by formal requirements: registered members and transferees of shares have standing to petition, regardless of beneficial interest or refusal to register. Prejudice to interests is relevant to relief, not to standing.
Court Disposition
Petitioners have standing to maintain the petition.
Orders
- Preliminary issue decided in favour of petitioners; all three petitioners have standing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment