Penfold v Fuller [2009] EWHC 1195 (Ch) (18 May 2009)
The party liable for court fees under the Fees Order is the party making the substantive claim currently before the court, not necessarily the party originally named as claimant. In this case, Mr Fuller, as the party seeking specific performance, is liable for the fees.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1195 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Louisa Penfold; Defendant: Tommy Fuller
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim (part 8 Procedure) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Liability for Court Fees After Tomlin Order Settlement
- Outcome
- Application granted; Mr Fuller held liable for court fees 2.2 and 2.3.
- Legal Topics
- Court Fees Liability, Interpretation of Fees Order, Specific Performance, Tomlin Order Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Louisa Penfold
Claimant
Tommy Fuller
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim (part 8 Procedure) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Liability for Court Fees After Tomlin Order Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is liable for payment of court fees 2.2 and 2.3 under the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008 in post-settlement proceedings where the original defendant seeks specific performance of a Tomlin Order?
Ratio Decidendi
The party liable for court fees under the Fees Order is the party making the substantive claim currently before the court, not necessarily the party originally named as claimant. In this case, Mr Fuller, as the party seeking specific performance, is liable for the fees.
Court Disposition
Application granted; Mr Fuller held liable for court fees 2.2 and 2.3.
Orders
- Mr Fuller is liable to pay fees 2.2 and 2.3 under the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment