Kivells Ltd v Torridge District Council [2019] EWHC 2846 (TCC) (31 October 2019)
The court found that the Agreement for Lease, including the annexed Cyril Sweett document, specified a reed bed wastewater treatment system. The Council breached this obligation by installing an activated sludge system (ASS) instead. The Council failed to establish any binding variation, waiver, or estoppel...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2846 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kivells Limited; Defendant: Torridge District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Lease Dispute (technology and Construction Court) / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Specification of Works, Landlord's Repair Obligations, Estoppel, Damages for Breach, Variation and Waiver of Contract, Quantum of Damages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kivells Limited
Claimant
Torridge District Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Lease Dispute (technology and Construction Court) / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What type of dirty water treatment system did Kivells contract for under the Agreement for Lease?
- 2 Was the Council in breach of contract by installing an activated sludge system (ASS) instead of a reed bed system?
- 3 Did the parties agree to a variation, waiver, or are Kivells estopped from insisting on a reed bed system?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Agreement for Lease, including the annexed Cyril Sweett document, specified a reed bed wastewater treatment system. The Council breached this obligation by installing an activated sludge system (ASS) instead. The Council failed to establish any binding variation, waiver, or estoppel preventing Kivells from relying on the original specification. The ASS as installed was found to be defective and constituted an Inherent Defect under the Lease. Kivells were entitled to damages for increased electricity and sewerage charges resulting from the installation and operation of the ASS, but not for the cost of rectification due to lack of landlord consent for alterations.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant in part
Orders
- Declaration that the Council was in breach of contract by failing to install a reed bed system.
- Damages awarded to Kivells for increased electricity and sewerage charges resulting from the ASS installation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment