National Policing Improvements Agency v Total Downstream UK Plc & Ors.
The confidentiality of matters concerning the NPIA justifies an order preventing non-parties from obtaining statements of case, subject to further application to the court.
- Parties
- Claimant: National Policing Improvements Agency; Defendant: Total Downstream UK PLC; Defendant: Total UK Limited; Defendant: Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited; Third Party: Chevron Limited; Fourth Party: Total Milford Haven Refinery Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Confidentiality Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality of Court Documents, Access to Court Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Policing Improvements Agency
Claimant
Total Downstream UK PLC
Defendant
Total UK Limited
Defendant
Hertfordshire Oil Storage Limited
Defendant
Chevron Limited
Third Party
Total Milford Haven Refinery Limited
Fourth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Confidentiality Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a non-party should be prevented from obtaining a copy of a statement of case under CPR rule 5.4C(1) due to confidentiality concerns
Ratio Decidendi
The confidentiality of matters concerning the NPIA justifies an order preventing non-parties from obtaining statements of case, subject to further application to the court.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- A non-party may not obtain a copy of a statement of case in these proceedings between NPIA and Total, subject to further order.
- Any person wishing to apply for disclosure must apply to the court and serve the parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment