Thames Valley Power Ltd. v Total Gas & Power Ltd.
The court held that increased market prices making performance uneconomic do not constitute force majeure under the Gas Supply Agreement. The contract required physical inability to perform, not mere commercial impracticability. The force majeure clause did not relieve Total from its obligation to supply gas at the contract price. The dispute resolution clause did not oust the court's jurisdiction in circumstances where the claim to force majeure was unsustainable as a matter of law, and a stay for expert determination was refused. TVPL was entitled to damages and specific performance if Total failed to supply gas.
- Parties
- Claimant: Thames Valley Power Limited; Defendant: Total Gas & Power Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment on Application for Stay and Substantive Relief
- Outcome
- Stay refused; declarations granted in favour of TVPL; entitlement to damages and specific performance confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Force Majeure, Expert Determination, Specific Performance, Damages, Interpretation of Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thames Valley Power Limited
Claimant
Total Gas & Power Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment on Application for Stay and Substantive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Total was entitled to serve a force majeure notice under the Gas Supply Agreement on the basis of increased market prices rendering performance uneconomic
- 2 Whether the dispute should be stayed for expert determination under the contract's dispute resolution clause
- 3 Whether TVPL is entitled to damages and/or specific performance if Total fails to supply gas
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that increased market prices making performance uneconomic do not constitute force majeure under the Gas Supply Agreement. The contract required physical inability to perform, not mere commercial impracticability. The force majeure clause did not relieve Total from its obligation to supply gas at the contract price. The dispute resolution clause did not oust the court's jurisdiction in circumstances where the claim to force majeure was unsustainable as a matter of law, and a stay for expert determination was refused. TVPL was entitled to damages and specific performance if Total failed to supply gas.
Court Disposition
Stay refused; declarations granted in favour of TVPL; entitlement to damages and specific performance confirmed.
Orders
- Total's application for a stay is dismissed.
- Declaration that Total was not entitled to serve the force majeure notice of 5 July 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment