TR v JM

TR v JM

The welfare of the children is best served by permitting the mother to relocate with them to the USA. The evidence demonstrates that refusal would likely result in a significant deterioration of the mother’s mental health, impairing her ability to parent and negatively impacting the children. The mother’s proposals for contact are reasonable and the children’s relationship with the father can be maintained. The financial and practical arrangements for the children’s education, healthcare, and living conditions are adequate in both jurisdictions. The interference with the children’s and father’s Article 8 rights is proportionate to the welfare benefits for the children.

Parties
Applicant: TR; Respondent: JM
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 International Relocation Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
International Relocation, Child Welfare, Parental Responsibility, Contact Arrangements
Family Law International Relocation Child Welfare Parental Responsibility Contact Arrangements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TR

Applicant

JM

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Children Act 1989 International Relocation Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the mother should be permitted to relocate with the children from the UK to the USA
  2. 2 What arrangements should be made for the children's welfare and contact with the father if relocation is permitted

Ratio Decidendi

The welfare of the children is best served by permitting the mother to relocate with them to the USA. The evidence demonstrates that refusal would likely result in a significant deterioration of the mother’s mental health, impairing her ability to parent and negatively impacting the children. The mother’s proposals for contact are reasonable and the children’s relationship with the father can be maintained. The financial and practical arrangements for the children’s education, healthcare, and living conditions are adequate in both jurisdictions. The interference with the children’s and father’s Article 8 rights is proportionate to the welfare benefits for the children.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Permission granted for the mother to relocate the children to the USA.
  • Parties to agree detailed contact arrangements; if not agreed, to submit positions for court determination.