Bell & Anor v Brabners LLP
The contract did not exclude statutory or common law rights to terminate the retainer for non-payment; section 65(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 and the common law right to terminate for reasonable cause apply alongside the contract terms. The duty of cooperation includes payment obligations, and the exercise of lien is not the sole consequence of non-payment.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tracey Bell; Applicant: Tracey Bell Ltd; Respondent: Brabners LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Retainer, Conditional Fee Agreements, Solicitor Client Relationship, Statutory Rights of Solicitors, Duty of Cooperation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tracey Bell
Applicant
Tracey Bell Ltd
Applicant
Brabners LLP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was entitled to terminate the conditional fee agreement and retainer
- 2 Whether section 65(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 applies
- 3 Whether the contract terms exclude statutory and common law rights to terminate
Ratio Decidendi
The contract did not exclude statutory or common law rights to terminate the retainer for non-payment; section 65(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 and the common law right to terminate for reasonable cause apply alongside the contract terms. The duty of cooperation includes payment obligations, and the exercise of lien is not the sole consequence of non-payment.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment