Keith-Smith v Williams
The defendant published seriously defamatory statements about the claimant on internet discussion groups, failed to justify or apologise, and persisted in abusive conduct. Damages are awarded for injury to reputation and feelings, with aggravated damages due to malice and contemptuous behaviour. Injunctive relief is granted to restrain further publication of similar libels.
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Keith-Smith; Defendant: Tracey Williams
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Quantum and Injunctive Relief After Default Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Injunction, Aggravated Damages, Internet Publication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Keith-Smith
Claimant
Tracey Williams
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Quantum and Injunctive Relief After Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 quantification of damages for defamation
- 2 appropriateness of aggravated damages
- 3 grant of prohibitory injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant published seriously defamatory statements about the claimant on internet discussion groups, failed to justify or apologise, and persisted in abusive conduct. Damages are awarded for injury to reputation and feelings, with aggravated damages due to malice and contemptuous behaviour. Injunctive relief is granted to restrain further publication of similar libels.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Defendant to pay £10,000 in damages (£5,000 compensatory, £5,000 aggravated).
- Prohibitory injunction granted restraining defendant from publishing or republishing the libels or similar libels in the future.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment