Felstead & Ors, R. v

Felstead & Ors, R. v

The question of whether contempt proceedings are to be initiated against Mr Marshall and/or Miss Page is adjourned for consideration after the appeals have been concluded. All further hearings must be before a different constitution.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Tracy Felstead; Appellant: Janet Skinner; Appellant: Seema Misra; Respondent: Post Office Legal Services; Interested Party: Mr Marshall; Interested Party: Miss Page
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
adjourned
Legal Topics
Improper Disclosure, Adjournment of Contempt Proceedings, Court Constitution
Criminal Law Contempt of Court Improper Disclosure Adjournment of Contempt Proceedings Court Constitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tracy Felstead

Appellant

Janet Skinner

Appellant

Seema Misra

Appellant

Post Office Legal Services

Respondent

Mr Marshall

Interested Party

Miss Page

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated against Mr Marshall and/or Miss Page
  2. 2 Whether the current constitution or a different constitution should hear further matters

Ratio Decidendi

The question of whether contempt proceedings are to be initiated against Mr Marshall and/or Miss Page is adjourned for consideration after the appeals have been concluded. All further hearings must be before a different constitution.

Court Disposition

adjourned

Orders

  • The question of whether contempt proceedings are to be initiated is adjourned until after the appeals are concluded.
  • All further hearings must be before a different constitution.