Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd. & Anor
The appeal is dismissed on the 452 mark due to reasons set out in the draft judgments; the cross-appeal is allowed regarding the device marks.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV; Defendant/respondent: Remington Consumer Products Ltd & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trademark, Appeal, Cross Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Claimant/appellant
Remington Consumer Products Ltd & Anr
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 452 mark is valid and infringed
- 2 Whether the device marks are valid and infringed
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed on the 452 mark due to reasons set out in the draft judgments; the cross-appeal is allowed regarding the device marks.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed, cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal refused
- Cross-appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment