Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd & Ors v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 24 (31 January 2012)
The Court held that the average consumer would not be confused by Asda's logo or straplines, given the differences in wording, context, and presentation. The use of the Asda logo and straplines did not infringe Specsavers' registered trade marks under Article 9(1)(b) or (c), nor did it amount to passing off. The Wordless logo mark was validly revoked for non-use.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 24
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Specsavers BV; Appellant/claimant: Specsavers Optical Group Ltd; Appellant/claimant: Specsavers Optical Superstores Ltd; Respondent/defendant: Asda Stores Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division), Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Intellectual Property)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off, Comparative Advertising, Likelihood of Confusion, Revocation for Non Use
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Specsavers BV
Appellant/claimant
Specsavers Optical Group Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Specsavers Optical Superstores Ltd
Appellant/claimant
Asda Stores Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division), Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Intellectual Property)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Asda's marketing campaign infringed Specsavers' registered trade marks under Article 9(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation 207/2009/EC
- 2 Whether Asda's use of straplines and logo amounted to passing off
- 3 Whether the Wordless logo mark should be revoked for non-use
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the average consumer would not be confused by Asda's logo or straplines, given the differences in wording, context, and presentation. The use of the Asda logo and straplines did not infringe Specsavers' registered trade marks under Article 9(1)(b) or (c), nor did it amount to passing off. The Wordless logo mark was validly revoked for non-use.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part
Orders
- No infringement found under Article 9(1)(b) or (c) for Asda logo or straplines
- Revocation of Wordless logo mark for non-use upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment