LL & Anor, R (on the application of) v Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
The Council Tax Reduction Scheme was unlawfully adopted as the full Council did not approve it as required by statute; the Scheme is irrational due to double counting of income, resulting in discriminatory outcomes for disabled persons and carers, breaching the Public Sector Equality Duty and Equality Act 2010;...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: LL; Claimant: AU; Defendant: Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review allowed; Scheme quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Council Tax Reduction Schemes, Public Sector Equality Duty, Discrimination, Rationality of Policy, Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LL
Claimant
AU
Claimant
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council Tax Reduction Scheme was lawfully adopted by the full Council as required by statute
- 2 Whether the Scheme is irrational due to double counting of income
- 3 Whether the Scheme breaches the Public Sector Equality Duty
Ratio Decidendi
The Council Tax Reduction Scheme was unlawfully adopted as the full Council did not approve it as required by statute; the Scheme is irrational due to double counting of income, resulting in discriminatory outcomes for disabled persons and carers, breaching the Public Sector Equality Duty and Equality Act 2010; discretionary relief does not cure these defects.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review allowed; Scheme quashed.
Orders
- Permission granted on both grounds.
- Council Tax Reduction Scheme quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment