Baird, R (on the application of) v The Tribunals Service

Baird, R (on the application of) v The Tribunals Service

The Minister's decision was not unlawful or perverse as the two times multiplier for meeting hours reasonably covered the duties required by the office, and the omission of travel time was not material to the outcome since the total hours still fell short of the threshold for full-time status.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Ian Edward Baird; Defendant: Tribunals Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Public Law Error, Pension Entitlement, Ministerial Discretion, Full Time Employment Definition
Administrative Law Employment Law Pensions Law Judicial Review Public Law Error Pension Entitlement Ministerial Discretion Full Time Employment Definition

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Edward Baird

Claimant

Tribunals Service

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Minister's decision that Mr Baird was not a full-time clerk was perverse or unlawful
  2. 2 Whether administrative and travel time should be included in assessing full-time status for pension purposes
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's policy was rigid and failed to consider individual circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister's decision was not unlawful or perverse as the two times multiplier for meeting hours reasonably covered the duties required by the office, and the omission of travel time was not material to the outcome since the total hours still fell short of the threshold for full-time status.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed