Triplark Limited v Martin Howard and 55 Ors
Clause 5(11) does not permit recovery of legal costs as part of the service charge. The wording is not clear and unambiguous enough to include legal costs, and litigation is not ancillary to management. The parties included express provisions for legal costs elsewhere in the lease, indicating that such costs are not recoverable under the general management clause.
- Parties
- Appellant: Triplark Limited; Respondents: Martin Howard and 55 others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Landlord and Tenant Service Charges / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) to Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Service Charges, Legal Costs, Lease Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Triplark Limited
Appellant
Martin Howard and 55 others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Landlord and Tenant Service Charges / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) to Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord can recover legal costs as part of the service charge under clause 5(11) of the lease
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 5(11) does not permit recovery of legal costs as part of the service charge. The wording is not clear and unambiguous enough to include legal costs, and litigation is not ancillary to management. The parties included express provisions for legal costs elsewhere in the lease, indicating that such costs are not recoverable under the general management clause.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- None of the legal costs making up the sum of £55,492.23 are recoverable under clause 5(11) of the lease.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment