- v - (London : Section 88(4)) [2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00BH_LCP_2013_0016 (24 September 2013)

- v - (London : Section 88(4)) [2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00BH_LCP_2013_0016 (24 September 2013)

The Tribunal determined the entitlement to costs and the validity of the right to manage exercise under Section 88(4).

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00BH_LCP_2013_0016
Parties
Applicant: Triplerose Ltd; Respondent: Bridge Co
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 September 2013
Procedural Posture
Right to Manage Decision / First Tier Tribunal Determination
Outcome
Application determined; right to manage upheld; costs not awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics
Right to Manage, Section 88(4) Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002
Property Law Right to Manage Section 88(4) Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Triplerose Ltd

Applicant

Bridge Co

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Right to Manage Decision / First Tier Tribunal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant landlord is entitled to recover costs under Section 20C
  2. 2 Whether the right to manage has been properly exercised

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal determined the entitlement to costs and the validity of the right to manage exercise under Section 88(4).

Court Disposition

Application determined; right to manage upheld; costs not awarded to applicant.