England and Wales Judgment

Sovereign Housing Association Limited v Troy Munroe

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant was found beyond reasonable doubt to have breached the injunction order by creating noise nuisance on specified dates, constituting contempt of court.

Court disposition

Defendant sentenced to 12 weeks custody suspended for 12 months for contempt of court.

Orders

  • Custodial sentence of 12 weeks suspended for 12 months imposed on the defendant

02

Material facts

Parties

Sovereign Housing Association Limited

Claimant

Troy Munroe

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Custodial Sentence (weeks): 12
  • Suspension Period (months): 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defendant breached the injunction order by playing music, shouting, swearing, and creating noise nuisance audible outside the premises on multiple dates.
Respondent
The defendant did not attend the hearing and no argument was presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Civil Procedure Rules and common law principles on contempt

    A person who breaches a court injunction is liable for contempt of court.

  2. 02

    Civil Procedure Rules

    Personal service of court orders and notice of hearing satisfies the requirement for knowledge of proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant was found beyond reasonable doubt to have breached the injunction order by creating noise nuisance on specified dates, constituting contempt of court.

Court disposition

Defendant sentenced to 12 weeks custody suspended for 12 months for contempt of court.

  • Custodial sentence of 12 weeks suspended for 12 months imposed on the defendant

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

Claim Number: K00BA332 Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWCC 9 In the County Court at Bath Sovereign Housing Association Limited (Claimant) 12 September 2024 -v- Troy Munroe (Defendant) Before: District Judge Byass On 12 September 2024, District Judge Byass sitting in the County Court at Bath as a District Judge of the County Court, sentenced the Defendant TROY MUNROE in his absence, to a custodial sentence of 12 weeks suspended for 12 months for contempt of court on breach of an Injunction Order dated 8 January 2024. The Court was satisfied that the Defendant TROY MUNROE was aware of the hearing in that he had been personally served with the Court’s Order dated 24 July 2024 and a Notice of Hearing listing the matter for sentence today, and had been present in Court on 24 July 2024 when the hearing date was set. The basis of the sentence imposed is that TROY MUNROE was found on 22 May 2024 beyond all reasonable doubt to be in breach of an Injunction dated 8 January 2024, by: 1. On 14 January 2024; 15 January 2024; 16 January 2024; 3 February 2024 at 13.04 hours; 6 February 2024 at 13.04 hours; 15 February 2024 at 08.44 hours; 8 March 2024 at 22.53 hours; 9 March 2024 at 00.01 hours; 10 March 2024 at 07.25 hours; 3 April 2024 at 22.41 hours; and 6 April 2024 at 00.12 hours of playing music; and/or shouting swearing and/or creating noise nuisance which is audible outside of 34 Towpath Road, Hilperton, Trowbridge BA14 7QD including shouting and swearing at his neighbours. The above breaches were contrary to the terms of the Injunction Order dated 8 January 2024 to which the Defendant TROY MUNROE was subject. District Judge Byass 12 September 2024

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Procedure Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.