S v S (No. 2)(Art 21 Welfare) [2026] EWHC 434 (Fam) (03 March 2026)
Given the established findings of serious domestic abuse, sexual abuse, coercive and controlling behaviour by the father towards the mother and children, the father's lack of insight or remorse, the children's clear and consistent wishes to have no contact, and the risk of further emotional and physical harm, it is in the children's best interests to make a final 'lives with' order in favour of the mother, prohibit all contact with the father, restrict the father's parental responsibility through specific issue and prohibited steps orders, and impose a s.91(14) order for five years to prevent further harmful litigation.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 434 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: TS; First Respondent: AS; Second Respondent (child): MS; Third Respondent (child): LS; Fourth Respondent (child): HS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps, Specific Issue, S.91(14)) / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Final 'lives with' order in favour of the mother; no contact (direct or indirect) between the children and their father; specific issue and prohibited steps orders restricting the father's parental responsibility; s.91(14) order imposed for five years against the father.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Orders, Prohibited Steps Orders, Specific Issue Orders, Section 91(14) Orders, Domestic Abuse, Parental Responsibility, Welfare of the Child, International Child Abduction, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TS
Applicant
AS
First Respondent
MS
Second Respondent (child)
LS
Third Respondent (child)
HS
Fourth Respondent (child)
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps, Specific Issue, S.91(14)) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a final 'lives with' order should be made in favour of the mother
- 2 Whether there should be any contact (direct or indirect) between the children and their father
- 3 Whether specific issue and prohibited steps orders should restrict the father's parental responsibility
Ratio Decidendi
Given the established findings of serious domestic abuse, sexual abuse, coercive and controlling behaviour by the father towards the mother and children, the father's lack of insight or remorse, the children's clear and consistent wishes to have no contact, and the risk of further emotional and physical harm, it is in the children's best interests to make a final 'lives with' order in favour of the mother, prohibit all contact with the father, restrict the father's parental responsibility through specific issue and prohibited steps orders, and impose a s.91(14) order for five years to prevent further harmful litigation.
Court Disposition
Final 'lives with' order in favour of the mother; no contact (direct or indirect) between the children and their father; specific issue and prohibited steps orders restricting the father's parental responsibility; s.91(14) order imposed for five years against the father.
Orders
- Final 'lives with' order in favour of the mother under s.8 Children Act 1989
- Order for no contact, direct or indirect, between the children and their father
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment